Paul applies YHWH's self-sworn oath from Isaiah 45 — the oath sworn by the one beside whom there is no other — directly to Jesus in Philippians 2:10-11. This article argues that the choice is not a loose borrowing of Isaianic language but an identification of Jesus within the divine identity of YHWH. Six sections engage the steel-man of the opposing case, the genuine concessions the text requires, the narrative logic of morphē and harpagmos, the oath's exclusivity logic, the patristic reception, and the open door for the reader willing to follow Paul where the text leads.
Tag: Septuagint
On the Use and Abuse of Philo — Creation, Time, the Logos
Lord Jesus Christ Reigns A response concerning creation, time, and the doctrine of the Logos — addressed to the Jehovah's Witness reader. Article I of VI I. The Question, and What Is Conceded A response that gives the opponent nothing has not engaged the opponent. The case for the deity of Christ does not require … Continue reading On the Use and Abuse of Philo — Creation, Time, the Logos
One Glory, Two Visions: John 12:41 and the Doxa of the Son
John 12:41 makes two claims that together carry the Trinitarian argument: that Isaiah saw Jesus's glory, and that the glory John attributes to Jesus elsewhere in his Gospel is pre-temporal Shekinah possessed παρὰ σοί before creation. Even granting the unitarian referent of Isaiah 52–53, the Servant's glorification read through John 17:5 is restoration of co-possessed eternal glory, not the elevation of a creature.
The Glory Isaiah Saw
A Catholic engagement with the published unitarian case for John 12:41. The grammar is granted; the lexical range is granted; and the pre-Nicene chain — Justin, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Origen — is set out from primary sources. The glory Isaiah saw is the glory of the eternal Son, and the glory the rulers refused.
When the Texts Are Allowed to Speak – Why the Son of Colossians 1:15 Is Not a Creature
There is a paragraph on page 383 of Greg Stafford's Jehovah's Witnesses Defended that does more work than perhaps any other single sentence in the book. The paragraph is short. It is also the moment where Stafford's argument either holds or breaks.





You must be logged in to post a comment.