The claim that the Synoptic Gospels present a theologically simple Jesus — a great teacher, an exalted prophet, an agent of God rather than God himself — is one of the most persistent errors in biblical interpretation. This article dismantles it text by text, argument by argument, across Psalm 110, Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and two thousand years of unbroken patristic testimony. The centerpiece is the argument that has never been successfully answered: in Matthew 5, Jesus places his own personal legislative word over against the Lex talionis — the foundational principle of all Mosaic criminal justice — from his own first-person authority. Deuteronomy 18:20 leaves exactly two categories of person who would do that. A false prophet condemned to death. Or the Lawgiver himself. There is no third category.